Latest topics
Log in
Statistics
We have 15 registered usersThe newest registered user is Keith David
Our users have posted a total of 5723 messages in 2445 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 9 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 9 Guests :: 1 BotNone
Most users ever online was 516 on Thu 4 Jun 2015 - 16:29
Warren and Whitechapel
Page 1 of 1
Warren and Whitechapel
WARREN AND WHITECHAPEL.
HIS SINGULAR REASONS FOR NOT CATCHING THE MURDERER - MR. GLADSTONE, THE REPORTERS AND EVERYBODY BLAMED.
LONDON, Oct. 25 - Sir Charles Warren has written an article for publication on Saturday explaining his failure to catch the Whitechapel murderer. Gen. Warren insinuates that London is practically under mob rule, and that Mr. Gladstone encouraged it. These are his words:
"It is to be deplored that the successive governments have not had the courage to make a stand against the more noisy section, and have given way before the tumultuous proceedings which have exercised terrorism over peaceful and law-abiding citizens, and it is still more to be regretted that certain ex-Cabinet Ministers while in opposition have not hesitated to embarass those in power by smiling on the insurgent mob. There can be very little doubt that the outcry against the police as a military force, instigated for political or sinister purposes, is due to the Englishman who poses as the censor of public bodies and who possesses, as a rule, one idea at a time."
This refers to Mr. Gladstone, and will create great indignation among his followers when the article is made public. the article generally is a weakening on Gen. Warren's part, and he now even asserts that the police force might be reduced if all London would resolve itself into a vigilance committee. Yet it stands as a matter of record that the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee has received almost no recognition from Gen. Warren. Sir Charles also accuses the reporters, who have done more to solve the mystery of the crime than any one else, with hampering his work. Sir Charles Warren makes comparisons of London with the French and Continental police, but utterly ignores Superintendent Murray's force, as he is very sore about the New York criticisms on him.
Source: Montreal Weekly Witness, Wednesday October 31, 1888, Page 1
HIS SINGULAR REASONS FOR NOT CATCHING THE MURDERER - MR. GLADSTONE, THE REPORTERS AND EVERYBODY BLAMED.
LONDON, Oct. 25 - Sir Charles Warren has written an article for publication on Saturday explaining his failure to catch the Whitechapel murderer. Gen. Warren insinuates that London is practically under mob rule, and that Mr. Gladstone encouraged it. These are his words:
"It is to be deplored that the successive governments have not had the courage to make a stand against the more noisy section, and have given way before the tumultuous proceedings which have exercised terrorism over peaceful and law-abiding citizens, and it is still more to be regretted that certain ex-Cabinet Ministers while in opposition have not hesitated to embarass those in power by smiling on the insurgent mob. There can be very little doubt that the outcry against the police as a military force, instigated for political or sinister purposes, is due to the Englishman who poses as the censor of public bodies and who possesses, as a rule, one idea at a time."
This refers to Mr. Gladstone, and will create great indignation among his followers when the article is made public. the article generally is a weakening on Gen. Warren's part, and he now even asserts that the police force might be reduced if all London would resolve itself into a vigilance committee. Yet it stands as a matter of record that the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee has received almost no recognition from Gen. Warren. Sir Charles also accuses the reporters, who have done more to solve the mystery of the crime than any one else, with hampering his work. Sir Charles Warren makes comparisons of London with the French and Continental police, but utterly ignores Superintendent Murray's force, as he is very sore about the New York criticisms on him.
Source: Montreal Weekly Witness, Wednesday October 31, 1888, Page 1
Similar topics
» Warren Was Dismissed
» Warren's Despotism
» Letter Regarding Warren
» Interview With Warren
» Warren and the Home Secretary
» Warren's Despotism
» Letter Regarding Warren
» Interview With Warren
» Warren and the Home Secretary
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Wed 29 Dec 2021 - 22:22 by Guest
» SK Profile and Indicators
Mon 27 Dec 2021 - 15:46 by Guest
» Primacy of Victimology
Sat 25 Dec 2021 - 0:44 by Guest
» Serial Killer Age Demographics
Sat 25 Dec 2021 - 0:06 by Guest
» Freemasons and Human Anatomy
Fri 24 Dec 2021 - 1:12 by Guest
» Son of Jim and Mary?
Thu 23 Dec 2021 - 19:30 by Guest
» The Maybrick Diary: A New Guide through the Labyrinth
Fri 3 Dec 2021 - 19:28 by Guest
» Doeology v Genealogy
Sat 13 Nov 2021 - 21:46 by Guest
» Given up on George Chapman?
Fri 5 Nov 2021 - 20:15 by Guest
» The Meaning of the Goulston Street Graffiti
Sat 11 Sep 2021 - 19:10 by Guest