Latest topics
Log in
Statistics
We have 15 registered usersThe newest registered user is Keith David
Our users have posted a total of 5723 messages in 2445 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 29 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 29 Guests :: 1 BotNone
Most users ever online was 516 on Thu 4 Jun 2015 - 16:29
Considerable Anatomical Knowledge Shown
Page 1 of 1
Considerable Anatomical Knowledge Shown
THE WHITECHAPEL HORROR.
FISHING FOR CLUES - INQUEST DISCLOSURES.
LONDON, September 21.
Another week has passed, and the Whitechapel murders are mysterious still. All hopes of finding the assassin have, indeed, been long ago abandoned, save by the indomitable Sir Charles Warren and the indefatigable Detective Superintendent Abberline. The last-named officer, you may remember, was the one who defeated the Jubilee Day dynamitard plot and brought the last of the famous gang to justice. He does not pretend to be a Lecocq, but, given a clue, he can follow it up as well as any man. The Whitechapel murders are perplexing and confounding because of the total absence of clues. The nearest approach to one transpired in the course of the medical evidence at the inquests, but the suggestions it implies are so horrible I scarcely like to name them. The doctors declare that in both poor women's corpses the womb was cut out and taken away, and that the operations showed the murderer to be possessed of considerable anatomical knowledge. The inference an American detective, who was interviewed by the "Star" the other day, draws from this is that the murder was committed either by a doctor or medical student who makes a specialty of diseases of the womb. When one remembers what frightful cruelties medical and surgical enthusiasts have committed in the so-called cause of science, this thesis really does not seem beyond the bounds of possibility. In the case of the woman killed in Hanbury-street, the doctors declare that the murderer was busily at work for at least twenty minutes. "With my surgical knowledge I couldn't have accomplished the mutilation in less time," deposed one witness. The police cannot, however, learn that any well-dressed man was seen prowling about Whitechapel that night.
Source: Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 316, 14 November 1888, Page 3
Note: As the list of suspects continue to grow out of every nook and cranny, let us never forget the inquest testimony and post-mortem data of each of the Whitechapel murders, and notice how even the police surgeons of the day noticed the killer's anatomical and surgical prowess. If the suspect that you prefer did not have medical knowledge, just how good of a suspect are they? For instance, when did Leo Taxil obtain his medical degree and from which academic institution?
FISHING FOR CLUES - INQUEST DISCLOSURES.
LONDON, September 21.
Another week has passed, and the Whitechapel murders are mysterious still. All hopes of finding the assassin have, indeed, been long ago abandoned, save by the indomitable Sir Charles Warren and the indefatigable Detective Superintendent Abberline. The last-named officer, you may remember, was the one who defeated the Jubilee Day dynamitard plot and brought the last of the famous gang to justice. He does not pretend to be a Lecocq, but, given a clue, he can follow it up as well as any man. The Whitechapel murders are perplexing and confounding because of the total absence of clues. The nearest approach to one transpired in the course of the medical evidence at the inquests, but the suggestions it implies are so horrible I scarcely like to name them. The doctors declare that in both poor women's corpses the womb was cut out and taken away, and that the operations showed the murderer to be possessed of considerable anatomical knowledge. The inference an American detective, who was interviewed by the "Star" the other day, draws from this is that the murder was committed either by a doctor or medical student who makes a specialty of diseases of the womb. When one remembers what frightful cruelties medical and surgical enthusiasts have committed in the so-called cause of science, this thesis really does not seem beyond the bounds of possibility. In the case of the woman killed in Hanbury-street, the doctors declare that the murderer was busily at work for at least twenty minutes. "With my surgical knowledge I couldn't have accomplished the mutilation in less time," deposed one witness. The police cannot, however, learn that any well-dressed man was seen prowling about Whitechapel that night.
Source: Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 316, 14 November 1888, Page 3
Note: As the list of suspects continue to grow out of every nook and cranny, let us never forget the inquest testimony and post-mortem data of each of the Whitechapel murders, and notice how even the police surgeons of the day noticed the killer's anatomical and surgical prowess. If the suspect that you prefer did not have medical knowledge, just how good of a suspect are they? For instance, when did Leo Taxil obtain his medical degree and from which academic institution?
Similar topics
» Pinchin Street Torso
» Inquest of Sarah Ann Kelly
» Exposure of Anatomical Models
» Anatomical/Surgical Skill Present
» Inquest of Sarah Ann Kelly
» Exposure of Anatomical Models
» Anatomical/Surgical Skill Present
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Wed 29 Dec 2021 - 22:22 by Guest
» SK Profile and Indicators
Mon 27 Dec 2021 - 15:46 by Guest
» Primacy of Victimology
Sat 25 Dec 2021 - 0:44 by Guest
» Serial Killer Age Demographics
Sat 25 Dec 2021 - 0:06 by Guest
» Freemasons and Human Anatomy
Fri 24 Dec 2021 - 1:12 by Guest
» Son of Jim and Mary?
Thu 23 Dec 2021 - 19:30 by Guest
» The Maybrick Diary: A New Guide through the Labyrinth
Fri 3 Dec 2021 - 19:28 by Guest
» Doeology v Genealogy
Sat 13 Nov 2021 - 21:46 by Guest
» Given up on George Chapman?
Fri 5 Nov 2021 - 20:15 by Guest
» The Meaning of the Goulston Street Graffiti
Sat 11 Sep 2021 - 19:10 by Guest